In this paper, we provide a rational analysis of the effects of sycophantic AI, considering how a Bayesian agent would respond to confirmatory evidence. Our analysis shows that such an agent will not get any closer to the truth, but will increase in their certainty about an incorrect hypothesis. We test this model in an online experiment where users are made to interact with an AI agent as they complete a rule discovery task. Our results show that the default interactions of a popular chatbot resemble the effects of providing people with confirmatory evidence, increasing confidence but bringing them no closer to the truth. These results provide a theoretical and empirical demonstration of how conversations with generative AI chatbots can facilitate delusion-like epistemic states, producing beliefs markedly divergent from reality.
ВсеПолитикаОбществоПроисшествияКонфликтыПреступность，更多细节参见快连下载安装
Популярность красной икры в России объяснили08:48，更多细节参见必应排名_Bing SEO_先做后付
据悉，荣耀和阿莱在影像领域的一系列合作成果，将在荣耀机器人手机 Robot Phone 上率先落地。，这一点在体育直播中也有详细论述
"You've got someone who is amazing," said Knight of Murphy.